Their Names Are MRC-5 and WI-38

*Trigger warning: this post contains content discussing abortion, and may be upsetting to some readers*

In the 1960’s, two babies were aborted and their tissues provided cell lines used to produce several vaccines. If this is your first time hearing about this, you may be shocked. I know I was when I first learned this fact. I immediately went to the CDC website to look at the ingredients. I didn’t see the words “aborted baby cell lines” anywhere, but I did see some words I was unfamiliar with, such as MRC-5 and WI-38. So, I searched online for what those terms meant, and sure enough, it was as I had heard. Aborted babies’ cells were used to propagate viruses for vaccines. I shared this information with a few people close to me. I was told that no fetal tissue or cells remained in the actual vaccine. I was assured by several well-meaning individuals that it was really sad those two babies were killed, but I should think instead about the millions of lives saved through their sacrifice. I considered these points, but it didn’t sit right with me, so (as usual), I began to research. Here’s a portion of what I’ve found on this topic over the last four years.

Does any fetal tissue or cells remain in the final vaccine product?

As far as we can tell, no. But, perhaps what is left over is even worse. A recent study 1. looked at genome sequencing of the MRC-5 cell line used in vaccines and found some highly concerning information. What is left in the vaccine is “a complete individual genome, that is, the genomic DNA of all the chromosomes of an individual is present in the vaccine.” This article 2. confirms “Vaccines manufactured in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptably high levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants.” Not only that, many of the genes in this DNA strand have been associated with causing human cancer, and are potentially tumorigenic. 3. So, next time someone tries to convince you that it’s OK because there is no remaining tissue or cells of aborted babies in these vaccines, maybe remind them that cancer potentiality is probably more concerning than the gross out factor of having aborted baby tissue being injected into you.

Side note – it’s common knowledge that we’re not supposed to receive a blood transfusion from just anyone. We need blood that matches our own (or O-) for our bodies to be able to receive it properly. What could be the potential consequences of injecting foreign DNA into our bodies? Male DNA into females? Female DNA into males? Just some food for thought. If I find some research on this in the future, you can be sure I’ll share it with you.

Were only two babies aborted for research and development of vaccines?

No, this is blatantly false, a lie propagated by the vaccine industry and many well meaning people who don’t want to consider the alternative. While only two are listed on the CDC vaccine ingredient list (MRC-5 and WI-38), this does not mean only two babies were aborted and used for vaccine research. Stanley Plotkin, widely considered “the godfather of vaccines” for his years of work in research and development of vaccines, has admitted under oath to using 76 aborted babies for just one study. When pressed he admits to having used even more aborted babies throughout his lifetime work.

And if Plotkin’s testimony about using the tissues from aborted babies in his research is not concerning enough, consider watching this video where he discusses (once again, under oath) using experimental vaccines on orphans, mentally handicapped people, babies whose mothers were in prison and almost a million Africans under colonial rule.

Here are some of the names given to the babies who were aborted for vaccine research:

RA27/3 which stands for Rubella Abortus 27^th fetus, 3^rd tissue explant. 4.

HEK293 “a specific cell line originally derived from human embryonic kidney cells grown in tissue culture.” 5.

PER.C6 “The PER.C6 cell line is derived from human embryonic retinal cells, originally from the retinal tissue of an 18 week old fetus aborted in 1985” 6.

IMR-90 “Human Caucasian foetal lung fibroblast Derived from tissue of a 16 week old female Caucasian foetus.” 7.

WI-1 through WI-25 “To develop diploid human cell strains, Hayflick and Moorhead began cultivating cells from 25 different tissues retrieved from aborted fetuses. Those cells became 25 different human cell strains, named numerically WI-1 through WI-25.” 8.

This is by no means an extensive list of aborted babies used in vaccine research, but were ones I was personally able to verify. Clearly, more than two aborted babies have been used for vaccine research, so next time you hear someone parrot this common misconception, please inform them that this is FALSE.

If you are now thinking “OK, well, I understand that’s how they used to make vaccines, but it’s not like they need a continuous supply of aborted babies for vaccines. The cell lines are immortal after all!”

Sorry, but again, no. This article 9. which discusses three different cell lines derived from aborted babies states “With the diminishing supply of the human fetal lung WI-38 cell strain, a replacement for viral isolation is needed.” What was that? Diminishing supply??? You mean that cell strain can’t replicate forever? No it cannot. There is a big difference between “indefinitely” and “forever”. If you would like to learn more about why cell lines cannot actually be immortal, take some time to research the Hayflick Limit and cellular senescence.

Which leads me to my next point – Walvax-2. In 2015 9 babies were aborted in China for the purpose of finding a new lung fibroblast cell strain to replace the deteriorating strains that are currently being used in vaccines. These babies were aborted via “water bag method” – in the amniotic sac – to insure intact tissues upon arrival at the vaccine research laboratory. “They employed a special means of induction (the water bag method) so they or someone they delegated, could deliver to Bo Ma et al intact fetal cadavers with fresh organs which would facilitate, in turn, the ready harvest of the needed fetal fibroblast lung tissue”. 10.

Furthermore, evidence shows that some of these babies aborted in this way are still alive upon arrival at the lab and when harvesting organs commences. A former ex-procurement technician at StemExpress confirmed this: “On one occasion, she was told to harvest the brain from an aborted child whose heart began beating.” 11.

And for the naysayers that will complain the above are not “reliable sources,” here’s a PubMed article for you discussing Walvax-2 being a suitable candidate for vaccine production. 12.

Finally, we come to MRC-5 and WI-38. MRC-5 is a cell line developed from a Caucasian male baby aborted at 14 weeks gestation. WI-38 is a cell line derived from a female baby aborted at 3 months. This part is for my pro-life friends who choose to vaccinate. Did you know? If you didn’t, well you do now, and I lovingly ask you to consider these points as I share with you the phrase that has so often helped me when learning uncomfortable truths: When you know better, you do better.

If you did know and you continue to allow your children to be vaccinated, let me ask you: is it worth it? Potential of cancer, unknown cause and effect of injected human DNA, yes, I think these are concerns. But truthfully, the biggest concern is what it says about you if you learn this information and choose to change nothing. These babies were aborted and sent alive to the lab where they were cut to pieces and their organs were harvested. Their body parts used over and over again for research and their DNA injected into other babies without their consent. Would “the greater good” be worth it if this was your child? Does it make a difference in their humanity whether they were “wanted” or not? If you choose to continue vaccinating, that is your choice, but I leave you with this sentiment: Their names are MRC-5, and WI-38, the only names these babies were given, and they were sacrificed on the altar of “immunity” so you could believe in the greater good.

1. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/CORVELVA-MRC-5-contained-in-Priorix-Tetra-Complete-genome-sequencing.pdf
2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103708
3. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/new-data-shows-aborted-fetal-cells-in-vaccines/
4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC375746/?page=1
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HEK_293_cells
6. https://www.gmp-creativebiolabs.com/per-c6-cell-lines_74.htm
7. https://www.phe-culturecollections.org.uk/products/celllines/generalcell/detail.jsp?refId=85020204&collection=ecacc_gc
8. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/serial-cultivation-human-diploid-cells-lab-1958-1961-leonard-hayflick-and-paul-s-moorhead
9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC274969/
10. http://ethicalresearch.net/positions/the-ethics-of-the-walvax-2-cell-strain/
11. https://www.liveaction.org/news/stemexpress-harvest-intact-children/?fbclid=IwAR2uQNqttd-rMEs9PTB6OI3ez4Tr7af1tKSZCRdSBJVOf7oHxXhTze4Ubd4
12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4526020/?fbclid=IwAR26vB_VjQ7FS1Kv1fNTeOd5FYzhTAmbPQds-1_68wUTUCHisTOSHvSr1ck